Site-Neutral Payments Cases We're Tracking
1:18-cv-02841
American Hospital Association et al. v. Becerra
1:19-cv-00132
University of Kansas Hospital Authority et al. v. Azar
1:19-cv-01745
Hackensack Meridian Health et al. v. Azar
1:20-cv-00080
Site-based payment differentials for health care services have been identified as one factor that drives up health care costs for patients and increases commercial and public health care spending. Additionally, these differentials have contributed to a rise in consolidation between hospitals and physicians’ practices, which has exacerbated issues related to health care costs and spending. Efforts to adopt site-neutral payment measures aimed at equalizing reimbursement rates for the same health services regardless of where those services are received, however, continue to face litigation challenges, especially from hospital organizations and providers.
1 active district court
1 active circuit court
Not shown: Puerto Rico (First Circuit), the U.S. Virgin Islands (Third Circuit), and Guam and the Northern Mariana Islands (Ninth Circuit).
All trend data is based solely on the cases on this website; if you want to recommend a new case to include, please let us know at hpli@georgetown.edu.
1:18-cv-02841
1:19-cv-00132
1:19-cv-01745
1:20-cv-00080