Reproductive Health

Access to safe, quality reproductive health services, including abortion care and contraceptive care, is in jeopardy by litigation and state laws aiming to limit where and when an individual can seek effective reproductive health care. This is particularly true since the Supreme Court’s 2022 decision in Dobbs v. Jackson Women’s Health Organization, which overturned the federal right to abortion established in Roe v. Wade and led to the current fragmented landscape of state reproductive health policies. The coverage and provision of safe and effective reproductive health services is essential to an individual’s health and well-being.

Tracked Litigation

Matsumoto et al. v. Labrador

Purcell et al. v. Kennedy et al.

Welty et al. v. Dunaway et al.

Welty et al. v. Dunaway et al.

Matsumoto et al. v. Labrador

Bryant v. Stein et al.

Bryant v. Stein et al.

Inactive Case

Yellowhammer Fund v. Marshall

Inactive Case

Idaho v. United States

Inactive Case

United States v. State of Idaho

Inactive Case

United States v. State of Idaho

Issue Metadata

Important Date

Discovery Deadline

Defendants' Consolidated Response Due

Proposed Case Schedule Due

Plaintiff and Defendant Second Brief Due

Defendants' Response to Motion for Preliminary Injunction Due

Defendant's Response to Motion for an Extension of Unexpired Scheduling Order Deadlines Due