Ross et al. v. University of Pittsburgh Medical Center

Docket No.
1:24-cv-00016
District Court
Pennsylvania Western

Goal

  • Award damages
  • Award restitution
  • Block anticompetitive practices
  • Certify class
  • Declaration that defendant action is unlawful

Litigation Content

Why This Matters:

Why This Matters:

Employees of the University of Pittsburgh Medical Center allege that the hospital violated Section 2 of the Sherman Act. The employees argue that the hospital uses its monopsony power to suppress wages, increase workloads, and restrict the mobility of skilled health care workers through anticompetitive practices such as non-compete clauses and “do not rehire” blacklists.

Potential Impact:

Potential Impact:

Anticompetitive practices by dominant health care providers can impact labor markets, potentially suppressing wages, worsening working conditions, and ultimately impacting the quality of patient care.

Litigation Information

Current Status

Briefing is ongoing