Cleveland Bakers and Teamsters Health and Welfare Fund v. OhioHealth Corporation

Docket No.
2:26-cv-01005
District Court
Ohio Southern — Western

Goal

  • Award damages
  • Award restitution
  • Block anticompetitive practices
  • Certify class
  • Declaration that defendant action is unlawful

Litigation Content

Why This Matters:

Why This Matters:

Plaintiff, a union health plan, alleges that OhioHealth Corporation, a large hospital system in the Columbus area, leverages its market power to force employers to accept anti-competitive contract terms in violation of federal and state antitrust law. The challenged anti-competitive practices include all-or-nothing tying clauses (requiring contracts with all providers or services as a bundle) and anti-steering clauses (preventing business from being directed to less costly or higher-quality providers).

Potential Impact:

Potential Impact:

Restrictions on anticompetitive practices by dominant health care providers can help reduce health care prices and lower health care premiums for consumers.

Litigation Information

Current Status

Briefing is ongoing

Important Date

Defendant's Response Due