Cleveland Bakers and Teamsters Health and Welfare Fund v. OhioHealth Corporation

Docket No.
2:26-cv-01005
District Court
Ohio Southern — Western

Goal

  • Award damages
  • Award restitution
  • Block anticompetitive practices
  • Certify class
  • Declaration that defendant action is unlawful

Litigation Content

Why This Matters:

Why This Matters:

Plaintiff, a union health plan, alleges that OhioHealth Corporation, a large hospital system in the Columbus area, leverages its market power to force employers to accept anti-competitive contract terms in violation of federal and state antitrust law. The challenged anti-competitive practices include all-or-nothing tying clauses (requiring contracts with all providers or services as a bundle) and anti-steering clauses (preventing business from being directed to less costly or higher-quality providers).

Potential Impact:

Potential Impact:

Restrictions on anticompetitive practices by dominant health care providers can help reduce health care prices and lower health care premiums for consumers.

2 Major Filings

Litigation Information

Current Status

Briefing is ongoing