- Docket No.
- 25-5738
- Appellate Court
- Sixth Circuit
Goal
- Block enforcement of a law
- Declaration that a law is unlawful
Issues
Case History
Litigation Content
Why this Matters:
The Plaintiffs argue that a state law that criminalizes speech and travel concerning access to legal abortion care violates both the First and Fourteenth Amendments of the U.S. Constitution. Aiding travel ensures that individuals living in states that prohibit abortion can access safe abortion elsewhere. This appeal addresses whether the district court erred in granting the plaintiff’s motion for summary judgment.
Potential Impact:
Restricting speech and preventing assistance to individuals seeking abortion care outside of their state will exacerbate the health harms of individuals who already face significant hardships in accessing safe abortion health care.