- Docket No.
- 25-5738
- Appellate Court
- Sixth Circuit
Goal
- Block enforcement of a law
- Declaration that a law is unlawful
Issues
Case History
Litigation Content
Why this Matters:
The plaintiffs argue that a state law that criminalizes speech and travel related to lawful abortion care violates the First and Fourteenth Amendments of the U.S. Constitution. Both parties appeal a partial judgment on the plaintiffs’ motion for summary judgment.
Potential Impact:
Accurate information and the ability to travel help ensure that women can receive a referral and travel to access the lawful reproductive health care that they want or need.
19 Major Filings
- SCHEDULING ORDER (Feb 5, 2026)
- AMICUS BRIEF [PHYSICIANS FOR HUMAN RIGHTS] (Feb 4, 2026)
- AMICUS BRIEF [NATIONAL CENTER FOR YOUTH LAW] (Feb 4, 2026)
- AMICUS BRIEF [IF/WHEN/HOW: LAWYERING FOR REPRODUCTIVE JUSTICE] (Feb 4, 2026)
- AMICUS BRIEF [GLOBAL JUSTICE CENTER] (Feb 4, 2026)
- AMICUS BRIEF [COMPASSION & CHOICES] (Feb 4, 2026)
- AMICUS BRIEF [MIDWEST ACCESS COALITION INC.] (Feb 4, 2026)
- AMICUS BRIEF [ILLINOIS ET AL.] (Feb 4, 2026)
- AMICUS BRIEF [AMERICAN CIVIL LIBERTIES UNION ET AL.] (Feb 4, 2026)
- PLAINTIFFS' SECOND BRIEF (Jan 28, 2026)
- SCHEDULING ORDER (Jan 6, 2026)
- SCHEDULING ORDER (Nov 26, 2025)
- AMICUS BRIEF [THOMAS MORE SOCIETY] (Nov 21, 2025)
- AMICUS BRIEF [COMMONWEALTH OF KENTUCKY ET AL.] (Nov 20, 2025)
- DEFENDANTS' FIRST BRIEF (Nov 13, 2025)
- SCHEDULING ORDER (Sep 9, 2025)
- SCHEDULING ORDER (Sep 3, 2025)
- PLAINTIFFS' NOTICE OF APPEAL (Aug 18, 2025)
- DEFENDANTS' NOTICE OF APPEAL (Aug 17, 2025)