- Docket No.
- 1:17-cv-00493
- District Court
- Hawaii
Goal
- Block government from enforcing all or part of mifepristone REMS
- Declaration that all or part of FDA's mifepristone REMS are unconstitutional
Issues
Litigation Content
Why this Matters:
The Plaintiff alleges that the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) violated the Equal Protection Clause of the U.S. Constitution and the Administrative Procedure Act by subjecting mifepristone to burdensome requirements that makes the drug extremely difficult to access and prescribe. Ensuring that individuals have access to safe and effective medication abortions enables patients to receive necessary reproductive health care.
Potential Impact:
Unnecessary restrictions on safe and effective drugs can create obstacles for doctors to promote medically appropriate care and jeopardize the health and safety of patients seeking medication for abortion services.
33 Major Filings
- DEFENDANTS’ CONCISE STATEMENT OF FACTS IN SUPPORT OF MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT (Dec 3, 2024)
- DEFENDANTS’ CROSS-MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT; MEMORANDUM OF LAW (Dec 3, 2024)
- DEFENDANTS’ CONCISE STATEMENT IN RESPONSE TO PLAINTIFFS’ CONCISE STATEMENT OF FACTS IN SUPPORT OF MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT (ECF. NO. 222) (Dec 3, 2024)
- DEFENDANTS’ COMBINED MEMORANDUM IN SUPPORT OF CROSS-MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT AND IN OPPOSITION TO PLAINTIFFS’ MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT (Dec 3, 2024)
- PLAINTIFFS’ CONCISE STATEMENT OF FACTS IN SUPPORT OF MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT (Oct 2, 2024)
- PLAINTIFFS’ MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT (Oct 2, 2024)
- ANSWER TO CORRECTED SECOND AMENDED AND SUPPLEMENTAL COMPLAINT (Aug 16, 2024)
- CORRECTED SECOND AMENDED AND SUPPLEMENTAL COMPLAINT (Aug 2, 2024)
- SECOND AMENDED AND SUPPLEMENTAL COMPLAINT (Jun 21, 2024)
- REPLY IN SUPPORT OF MOTION TO COMPLETE OR, IN THE ALTERNATIVE, SUPPLEMENT THE RECORD (Feb 21, 2024)
- DEFENDANTS’ OPPOSITION TO PLAINTIFFS’ MOTION TO COMPLETE OR, IN THE ALTERNATIVE, SUPPLEMENT THE RECORD (Jan 24, 2024)
- AMENDED COMPLAINT AND SUPPLEMENTAL COMPLAINT (Apr 10, 2023)
- DEFENDANTS’ STATEMENT OF NO OPPOSITION TO PLAINTIFFS’ MOTION FOR LEAVE TO FILE AMENDED AND SUPPLEMENTAL COMPLAINT (Apr 5, 2023)
- MOTION FOR LEAVE TO FILE AMENDED AND SUPPLEMENTAL COMPLAINT AND MEMORANDUM OF POINTS AND AUTHORITIES IN SUPPORT (Mar 30, 2023)
- PLAINTIFFS’ CONCISE STATEMENT OF FACTS IN SUPPORT OF MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT (Apr 16, 2021)
- JOINT STIPULATIONS OF FACTS (Apr 15, 2021)
- PLAINTIFFS’ UNOPPOSED MOTION TO LIFT STAY AND REACTIVATE SUMMARY JUDGMENT BRIEFING (Mar 4, 2021)
- DEFENDANTS’ CONCISE STATEMENT IN RESPONSE TO PLAINTIFFS’ CONCISE STATEMENT OF FACTS (Oct 1, 2020)
- ERRATUM REGARDING CONCISE STATEMENT PLAINTIFF'S MEMORANDUM OF LAW IN OPPOSITION TO DEFENDANTS' CROSS-MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT (Oct 1, 2020)
- PLAINTIFFS’ CONCISE STATEMENT OF FACTS IN OPPOSITION TO DEFENDANTS’ MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT (Oct 1, 2020)
- PLAINTIFFS’ MEMORANDUM OF LAW IN OPPOSITION TO DEFENDANTS’ MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT; CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE (Oct 1, 2020)
- DEFENDANTS’ RESPONSE REGARDING A STAY (Jan 17, 2020)
- PLAINTIFFS’ MEMORANDUM OPPOSING A STAY PENDING DISPOSITION OF GEE V. JUNE MEDICAL SERVICES, LLC (Jan 17, 2020)
- DEFENDANTS’ MEMORANDUM IN OPPOSITION TO PLAINTIFFS’ CROSS-MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT (Jan 10, 2020)
- PLAINTIFFS’ MEMORANDUM OF LAW IN OPPOSITION TO DEFENDANTS’ MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT; CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE (Jan 10, 2020)
- DEFENDANTS’ CROSS-MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT (Dec 2, 2019)
- JOINT STIPULATION OF FACTS (Nov 27, 2019)
- MEMORANDUM IN SUPPORT OF DEFENDANTS’ CROSS-MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT (Feb 12, 2019)
- ANSWER TO COMPLAINT (Jun 29, 2018)
- NOTICE OF ERRATUM TO PLAINTIFFS’ MEMORANDUM OF LAW IN OPPOSITION TO DEFENDANTS’ 12(b)(1) MOTION TO DISMISS (Apr 18, 2018)
- PLAINTIFFS’ MEMORANDUM OF LAW IN OPPOSITION TO DEFENDANTS’ MOTION TO DISMISS (Apr 12, 2018)
- DEFENDANTS’ MOTION TO DISMISS COMPLAINT (Feb 5, 2018)
- COMPLAINT (Oct 3, 2017)