- Docket No.
- 25-1829
- Appellate Court
- First Circuit
Goal
- Block enforcement of a law
- Declaration that a law is unlawful
Issues
Case History
Litigation Content
Why This Matters:
The plaintiffs challenge a provision in the recently enacted reconciliation legislation prohibiting certain health centers that provide abortions that fall outside of the narrow exceptions in the Hyde Amendment, including those associated with Planned Parenthood, from receiving Medicaid reimbursement for one year as violating the Due Process Clause of the Constitution. These clinics provide access to care for many clinically underserved and low-income populations, and this provision could force clinics to close or reduce their service areas, eroding access to maternal health care and other non-abortion services. This appeal addresses whether the district court erred in denying the plaintiff’s motion for preliminary injunction.
Potential Impact:
Terminating funding could force qualifying clinics to close and eliminate essential services, which would leave countless individuals without necessary access to sexual and reproductive health care, as well as general preventive health services.
14 Major Filings
- PLAINTIFF'S RESPONSE TO MOTION FOR STAY (Nov 12, 2025)
- DEFENDANTS' MOTION FOR STAY (Nov 7, 2025)
- AMICUS BRIEF [MAINE MEDICAL ASSOCIATION ET AL.] (Oct 29, 2025)
- AMICUS BRIEF [NATIONAL HEALTH LAW PROGRAM ET AL.] (Oct 29, 2025)
- AMICUS BRIEF [STATE OF MAINE] (Oct 29, 2025)
- AMICUS BRIEF [WILLIAM D. ARAIZA] (Oct 29, 2025)
- JOINT APPENDIX (Oct 23, 2025)
- PLAINTIFF'S OPENING BRIEF (Oct 22, 2025)
- ORDER ON MOTION FOR INJUNCTION PENDING APPEAL (Oct 16, 2025)
- PLAINTIFF'S NOTICE (Sep 29, 2025)
- DEFENDANTS' RESPONSE TO MOTION FOR INJUNCTION PENDING APPEAL (Sep 26, 2025)
- PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR INJUNCTION PENDING APPEAL (Sep 17, 2025)
- SCHEDULING ORDER (Sep 12, 2025)
- PLAINTIFF'S NOTICE OF APPEAL (Aug 29, 2025)