American Medical Association et al. v. Department of Health and Human Services et al.

Docket No.
1:21-cv-3231
District Court
District of Columbia

Goal

  • Declaration that agency action is unlawful

Litigation Content

This case has been consolidated with Association of Air Medical Services et al. v. Department of Health and Human Services et al. (1:21-cv-03031), which has been made the leading case. All filings post-consolidation are located on the Association of Air Medical Services et al. v. Department of Health and Human Services et al. case page.

Why this Matters
The plaintiffs argue that regulations to impose guardrails on the No Surprises Act’s arbitration process— used to resolve payment disputes for surprise out-of-network bills between payers and out-of-network health care providers—are invalid under the Administrative Procedure Act. If federal agencies cannot set reasonable guidelines for arbitrators, certain providers could be more likely to abuse this process to obtain higher payments, making the arbitration process more likely to become inflationary, and leading to higher health care costs and premiums.

Potential Impact
The inability to impose reasonable guardrails for the No Surprises Act’s arbitration process could lead to abuses of the process and higher health care costs and premiums.

News And Analysis (1)

Litigation Information

Current Status

Consolidated with 1:21-cv-3031

View New Case