- Docket No.
- Appellate Court
- Fifth Circuit
- Invalidate all or part of a federal regulation
- Stop the government from enforcing the statute or regulation
Why this Matters
The plaintiffs argue that regulations to impose guardrails on the No Surprises Act’s arbitration process—a process used to resolve payment disputes for surprise out-of-network bills between payers and out-of-network health care providers—are invalid under the Administrative Procedure Act. If federal agencies cannot set reasonable guidelines for arbitrators, certain providers could be more likely to try to abuse this process to obtain higher payments, making the arbitration process more likely to become inflationary, and leading to higher health care costs and premiums.
The inability to impose reasonable guardrails for the No Surprises Act’s arbitration process could lead to abuses of the process and higher health care costs and premiums.
News And Analysis (1)
14 Major Filings
- REPLY BRIEF FOR APPELLANTS (Oct 16, 2023)
- AMICUS BRIEF (AHA and AMA) (Sep 18, 2023)
- AMICUS BRIEF (American Society of Anesthesiologists et al.) (Sep 18, 2023)
- AMICUS BRIEF (EDPMA) (Sep 18, 2023)
- AMICUS BRIEF (Physicians Advocacy Institute et al.) (Sep 18, 2023)
- APPELLEES' BRIEF (LifeNet et al.) (Sep 11, 2023)
- APPELLEES' BRIEF (TMA et al.) (Sep 11, 2023)
- AMICUS BRIEF BCBSA (Jul 19, 2023)
- AMICUS BRIEF AHIP (Jul 19, 2023)
- AMICUS BRIEF_Employers (Jul 19, 2023)
- AMICUS BRIEF_Patient/Consumer Advocates (Jul 19, 2023)
- BRIEF FOR APPELLANTS (Jul 12, 2023)
- BRIEFING NOTICE (May 3, 2023)
- NOTICE OF APPEAL (Apr 6, 2023)