- Docket No.
- 24-2092
- Appellate Court
- Second Circuit
Goal
- Block government from enforcing results of negotiation
- Declaration that provisions are unconstitutional
Issues
Case History
Litigation Content
Why this Matters:
The plaintiff argues that the Inflation Reduction Act’s Medicare drug negotiation process violates the Due Process Clause of the Fifth Amendment, Takings Clause of the Fifth Amendment, First Amendment, Eighth Amendment, Unconstitutional Conditions doctrine, and the Administrative Procedure Act. Medicare’s authority to negotiate the price of certain single-source, high-priced drugs is estimated to result in substantial savings for Medicare beneficiaries and the federal government.
Potential Impact:
Successful challenges to Medicare’s negotiation authority would negate savings to Medicare beneficiaries and taxpayers, and could severely restrict federal regulatory authority in the health care arena.
14 Major Filings
- AMICUS BRIEF (Fresenius Kabi) (Nov 20, 2024)
- ORDER (Nov 19, 2024)
- SCHEDULING NOTIFICATION (Nov 13, 2024)
- AMICUS BRIEF (Alliance for Aging Research) (Nov 13, 2024)
- AMICUS BRIEF (Chamber of Commerce) (Nov 12, 2024)
- AMICUS BRIEF (Pioneer Public Interest Law Center) (Nov 12, 2024)
- AMICUS BRIEF (Institute for Free Speech) (Nov 12, 2024)
- AMICUS BRIEF (Atlantic Legal Foundation) (Nov 12, 2024)
- AMICUS BRIEF (Daniel E. Troy) (Nov 12, 2024)
- AMICUS BRIEF (National Taxpayer Union Foundation) (Nov 12, 2024)
- AMICUS BRIEF (Teva) (Nov 11, 2024)
- AMICUS BRIEF (New Civil Liberties Alliance) (Nov 8, 2024)
- AMICUS BRIEF (Independent Women's Law Center) (Nov 8, 2024)
- BRIEF FOR PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT (Nov 4, 2024)