- Docket No.
- 20-11179
- Appellate Court
- Fifth Circuit
Goal
- Block enforcement of an agency action
- Declaration that agency action is unlawful
Issues
Case History
Litigation Content
Why this Matters:
The plaintiffs ask that a particular partnership arrangement should be classified as a form of an employer group health plan under the Employee Retirement Income Security Act. Such classification would insulate the partnership from state regulation, and bar state and federal agencies from taking enforcement action against the partnership. The classification would also allow the partnership to be exempt from certain consumer protections that apply only to the individual and small group markets, including protections such as guaranteed issue, community rating, or coverage of the essential health benefits package under the Affordable Care Act. This appeal addresses whether the district court erred in finding that the defendants’ action was a final agency action under the APA and in granting the plaintiff’s motion for summary judgement.
Potential Impact:
Allowing such arrangements to avoid major Affordable Care Act protections and state regulation of private health insurance could destabilize health insurance markets through adverse selection and expose more consumers to potential fraud.
15 Major Filings
- MANDATE (Oct 11, 2022)
- JUDGMENT (Aug 17, 2022)
- OPINION (Aug 17, 2022)
- SCHEDULING ORDER (Nov 18, 2021)
- DEFENDANTS' REPLY BRIEF (Jul 13, 2021)
- AMICUS BRIEF [ADAM ROCHESTER ET AL.] (Jun 29, 2021)
- PLAINTIFF'S RESPONSE BRIEF (Jun 15, 2021)
- AMICUS BRIEF [BLUE CROSS BLUE SHIELD] (Apr 23, 2021)
- AMICUS BRIEF [LEUKEMIA & LYMPHOMA SOCIETY ET AL.] (Apr 23, 2021)
- AMICUS BRIEF [NATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF INSURANCE COMMISSIONERS] (Apr 23, 2021)
- AMICUS BRIEF [PUBLIC CITIZEN] (Apr 23, 2021)
- AMICUS BRIEF [DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA ET AL.] (Apr 7, 2021)
- AMICUS BRIEF [PENNSYLVANIA INSURANCE DEPARTMENT ET AL.] (Apr 7, 2021)
- DEFENDANTS' OPENING BRIEF (Mar 31, 2021)
- DEFENDANTS' NOTICE OF APPEAL (Nov 27, 2020)