United States et al. v. OhioHealth Corporation

Docket No.
2:26-cv-00207
District Court
Ohio Southern — Eastern

Goal

  • Block anticompetitive practices
  • Block defendant action
  • Declaration that defendant action is unlawful

Litigation Content

Potential Impact:

Why this Matters:

The plaintiffs allege that OhioHealth Corporation, a large hospital system in the Columbus area, leverages its market power to force insurers to accept anti-competitive contract terms in violation of federal and state antitrust law. The challenged anti-competitive practices include all-or-nothing tying clauses (requiring contracts with all providers or services as a bundle), anti-steering clauses (preventing business from being directed to less costly or higher-quality providers), and gag clauses (preventing plans from sharing information with their members).

Potential Impact:

Restrictions on anticompetitive practices by dominant health care providers can help reduce health care prices and lower health care premiums for consumers.

Litigation Information

Current Status

Briefing is ongoing

Important Date

Defendant's Answer Due