Texas Medical Association et al. v. Department of Health and Human Services et al. (TMA II)

Docket No.
23-40217
Appellate Court
Fifth Circuit

Goal

  • Block enforcement of an agency action
  • Declaration that agency action is unlawful

Litigation Content

Why this Matters

The plaintiffs argue that regulations to impose guardrails on the No Surprises Act’s arbitration process—a process used to resolve payment disputes for surprise out-of-network bills between payers and out-of-network health care providers—are invalid under the Administrative Procedure Act. In this appeal, the defendants argue that the district court erred in finding that the plaintiffs had standing to challenge the rule and in granting summary judgment for the plaintiffs.

Potential Impact

The inability to impose reasonable guardrails for the No Surprises Act’s arbitration process could lead to abuses of the process and higher health care costs and premiums.

Litigation Information

Current Status

Decision issued