- Docket No.
- 23-40217
- Appellate Court
- Fifth Circuit
Goal
- Block enforcement of an agency action
- Declaration that agency action is unlawful
Issues
Case History
Litigation Content
Why this Matters
The plaintiffs argue that regulations to impose guardrails on the No Surprises Act’s arbitration process—a process used to resolve payment disputes for surprise out-of-network bills between payers and out-of-network health care providers—are invalid under the Administrative Procedure Act. In this appeal, the defendants argue that the district court erred in finding that the plaintiffs had standing to challenge the rule and in granting summary judgment for the plaintiffs.
Potential Impact
The inability to impose reasonable guardrails for the No Surprises Act’s arbitration process could lead to abuses of the process and higher health care costs and premiums.
News And Analysis (2)
21 Major Filings
- Mandate (Sep 24, 2024)
- JUDGMENT (Aug 2, 2024)
- OPINION (Aug 2, 2024)
- RESPONSE TO NOTICE OF SUPPLEMENTAL AUTHORITIES (Jul 8, 2024)
- NOTICE OF SUPPLEMENTAL AUTHORITIES (Jul 3, 2024)
- RESPONSE TO LETTER OF SUPPLEMENTAL AUTHORITY (Feb 2, 2024)
- LETTER OF SUPPLEMENTAL AUTHORITY (Feb 2, 2024)
- REPLY BRIEF FOR APPELLANTS (Oct 16, 2023)
- AMICUS BRIEF (AHA and AMA) (Sep 18, 2023)
- AMICUS BRIEF (American Society of Anesthesiologists et al.) (Sep 18, 2023)
- AMICUS BRIEF (EDPMA) (Sep 18, 2023)
- AMICUS BRIEF (Physicians Advocacy Institute et al.) (Sep 18, 2023)
- APPELLEES' BRIEF (LifeNet et al.) (Sep 11, 2023)
- APPELLEES' BRIEF (TMA et al.) (Sep 11, 2023)
- AMICUS BRIEF BCBSA (Jul 19, 2023)
- AMICUS BRIEF AHIP (Jul 19, 2023)
- AMICUS BRIEF_Employers (Jul 19, 2023)
- AMICUS BRIEF_Patient/Consumer Advocates (Jul 19, 2023)
- BRIEF FOR APPELLANTS (Jul 12, 2023)
- BRIEFING NOTICE (May 3, 2023)
- NOTICE OF APPEAL (Apr 6, 2023)