- Docket No.
- 1:25-cv-00113
- District Court
- District of Columbia
Goal
- Declaration that CMS guidance is unlawful
- Declaration that drug negotiation program is unconstitutional
- Injunctive relief barring application of drug negotiation
Issues
Litigation Content
Why this Matters:
The plaintiffs argue that the Inflation Reduction Act’s Medicare drug negotiation process violates the Administrative Procedure Act and Due Process Clause of the Fifth Amendment. Medicare’s authority to negotiate the price of certain single-source, high-priced drugs is estimated to result in substantial savings for Medicare beneficiaries and the federal government.
Potential Impact:
Successful challenges to Medicare’s negotiation authority would negate savings to Medicare beneficiaries and taxpayers, and could severely restrict federal regulatory authority in the health care arena.
11 Major Filings
- MINUTE ORDER (Mar 22, 2025)
- AMICUS BRIEF (ASSOCIATION FOR ACCESSIBLE MEDICINES) (Mar 14, 2025)
- AMICUS BRIEF (BAUSCH HEALTH COMPANIES ET AL.) (Mar 14, 2025)
- PLAINTIFFS’ MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT AND MEMORANDUM IN SUPPORT (Mar 7, 2025)
- SCHEDULING ORDER (Mar 5, 2025)
- MINUTE ORDER STRIKING MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT (Feb 27, 2025)
- MINUTE ORDER (Feb 27, 2025)
- PLAINTIFFS’ MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT AND MEMORANDUM IN SUPPORT (Feb 26, 2025)
- JOINT MOTION TO VACATE THE ANSWER DEADLINE AND SET SUMMARY JUDGMENT BRIEFING SCHEDULE (Feb 21, 2025)
- AMENDED COMPLAINT (Feb 10, 2025)
- COMPLAINT (Jan 14, 2025)