- Docket No.
- 1:25-cv-00015
- District Court
- Idaho
Goal
- Block the state from enforcing aspects of the Idaho abortion ban
- Invalidate aspects of the Idaho abortion ban
Issues
Litigation Content
Why this Matters
A large health system in Idaho alleges that it cannot comply with an Idaho law prohibiting abortions unless necessary to save the life of the mother because the state law is preempted by the Emergency Medical Treatment and Labor Act (EMTALA). Ensuring that clinicians provide abortion services when required to stabilize a patient in a medical emergency situation enables patients to receive necessary life-saving care.
Potential Impact
Preventing women from accessing stabilizing care in emergency situations, if that care requires an abortion, will put the health and safety of women in jeopardy.
11 Major Filings
- REPLY IN SUPPORT OF MOTION TO DISMISS (Feb 26, 2025)
- REPLY IN SUPPORT OF PLAINTIFF’S MOTION TO CONSOLIDATE (Feb 20, 2025)
- ST LUKE'S CONSOLIDATED OPPOSITION TO MOTION TO DISMISS COMPLAINT AND REPLY IN SUPPORT OF MOTION FOR PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION (Feb 20, 2025)
- RESPONSE TO MOTION TO CONSOLIDATE (Feb 6, 2025)
- MOTION TO DISMISS AND MEMORANDUM IN SUPPORT (Feb 6, 2025)
- ORDER RE: STIPULATED BRIEFING SCHEDULE (Feb 6, 2025)
- AMICUS BRIEF OF AMERICAN HOSPITAL ASSOCIATION (Jan 17, 2025)
- ORDER AND NOTICE OF HEARING (Jan 15, 2025)
- MOTION TO EXPEDITE CONSIDERATION OF ST. LUKE’S HEALTH SYSTEM’S MOTION FOR PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION (Jan 14, 2025)
- MOTION FOR PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION (Jan 14, 2025)
- COMPLAINT (Jan 14, 2025)