- Docket No.
- 24-1570
- Appellate Court
- 9th Circuit
Goal
- Declaration that state law is unconstitutional
- Enjoin enforcement of law
Issues
Case History
Litigation Content
Why this Matters:
The plaintiffs argue that an Oregon law promoting increased transparency into prescription drug pricing violates the Takings Clause of the Fifth Amendment and the First Amendment. Transparency laws that require manufacturers to justify drug pricing increases are one approach states are currently pursuing to lower prescription drug costs for their residents.
Potential Impact:
The inability for state policymakers to address prescription drug affordability could negate savings for patients, and more broadly restrict state regulatory authority in the health care arena.
6 Major Filings
- DEFENDANT APPELLANT'S REPLY BRIEF (Oct 10, 2024)
- NOTICE OF ORAL ARGUMENT CONSIDERATION (Sep 26, 2024)
- AMICUS BRIEF (Chamber of Commerce) (Sep 11, 2024)
- PLAINTIFF APPELLEE'S BRIEF (Sep 4, 2024)
- AMICUS BRIEF (Oregon Coalition for Affordable Prescriptions) (Jul 12, 2024)
- APPELLANT'S OPENING BRIEF (Jul 5, 2024)