- Docket No.
- 24-1570
- Appellate Court
- Ninth Circuit
Goal
- Block enforcement of a law
- Declaration that a law is unlawful
Issues
Case History
Litigation Content
Why this Matters:
The plaintiffs argue that an Oregon law promoting increased transparency into prescription drug pricing violates the Takings Clause of the Fifth Amendment and the First Amendment. Transparency laws that require manufacturers to justify drug pricing increases are one approach states are currently pursuing to lower prescription drug costs for their residents.
Potential Impact:
The inability for state policymakers to address prescription drug affordability could negate savings for patients, and more broadly restrict state regulatory authority in the health care arena.
17 Major Filings
- MANDATE (Oct 31, 2025)
- ORDER ON PETITION FOR REHEARING (Oct 23, 2025)
- PLAINTIFF'S PETITION FOR REHEARING (Sep 30, 2025)
- OPINION (Aug 26, 2025)
- PLAINTIFF'S RESPONSE TO NOTICE OF SUPPLEMENTAL AUTHORITY (Jan 27, 2025)
- DEFENDANT'S NOTICE OF SUPPLEMENTAL AUTHORITIES (Jan 22, 2025)
- DEFENDANT'S REPLY BRIEF (Oct 10, 2024)
- SCHEDULING ORDER (Sep 24, 2024)
- AMICUS BRIEF [CHAMBER OF COMMERCE] (Sep 11, 2024)
- PLAINTIFF'S NOTICE OF SUPPLEMENTAL AUTHORITY (Sep 9, 2024)
- PLAINTIFF'S BRIEF (Sep 4, 2024)
- AMICUS BRIEF [STATE OF CALIFORNIA ET AL.] (Jul 13, 2024)
- AMICUS BRIEF (OREGON COALITION FOR AFFORDABLE PRESCRIPTIONS] (Jul 12, 2024)
- SCHEDULING ORDER (Jul 9, 2024)
- DEFENDANT'S OPENING BRIEF (Jul 5, 2024)
- SCHEDULING ORDER (May 14, 2024)
- DEFENDANT'S NOTICE OF APPEAL (Mar 13, 2024)