- Docket No.
- 6:18-cv-01944
- District Court
- Florida Middle
Goal
- Award damages
- Block anticompetitive practices
Issues
Case History
Litigation Content
The plaintiffs argue that certain exclusivity agreements between Florida’s most dominant health insurance company and agents and brokers are anticompetitive practices that violate federal and state law. If such practices are exempt from antitrust law and insurers are restricted from working with brokers to sell their insurance products in the individual market, consumers could ultimately face less competition and choice in the ACA Marketplaces.
Potential Impact
If certain conduct by health insurance companies is exempt from federal antitrust law, consumers could face less competition and higher prices.
17 Major Filings
- MANDATE (Feb 24, 2021)
- NOTICE OF APPEAL (Oct 15, 2019)
- OPINION (Sep 20, 2019)
- DEFENDANTS' RESPONSE RE: STATEMENT OF INTEREST (May 18, 2019)
- PLAINTIFF'S REPLY RE: STATEMENT OF INTEREST (May 17, 2019)
- STATEMENT OF INTEREST (Apr 24, 2019)
- PLAINTIFF'S RESPONSE RE: MOTION TO DISMISS (Mar 13, 2019)
- DEFENDANTS' MOTION TO DISMISS (Feb 27, 2019)
- ORDER ON MOTION FOR PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION (Feb 25, 2019)
- AMENDED COMPLAINT (Feb 13, 2019)
- ORDER (Feb 6, 2019)
- DEFENDANTS' MOTION TO DISMISS (Feb 1, 2019)
- DEFENDANTS' REPLY RE: MOTION FOR PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION (Jan 18, 2019)
- DECLARATION OF MARK A. ISRAEL (Dec 21, 2018)
- DECLARATION OF NICHOLAS GOSSEN (Dec 21, 2018)
- PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION (Nov 19, 2018)
- COMPLAINT (Nov 13, 2018)