- Docket No.
- 6:24-cv-00178
- District Court
- Texas Eastern
Goal
- Block government from enforcing provisions of regulation
- Declaration that Departments acted unlawfully
- Invalidate all or part of a federal regulation
Issues
Litigation Content
Why this Matters:
The plaintiffs allege that a federal regulation concerning notice requirements for fixed indemnity policies exceeds the statutory authority of the agencies who finalized the rule and violates the Administrative Procedure Act. As fixed indemnity policies do not have to comply with the Affordable Care Act’s market reforms, insurers can charge higher premiums based on health status, exclude coverage for preexisting conditions, impose annual or lifetime limits, opt not to cover entire categories of benefits, or rescind coverage altogether under such policies.
Potential Impact:
Without adequate disclosure and notice requirements related to fixed indemnity policies, consumers seeking comprehensive coverage enrolling in such policies could unintentionally be exposed to significant financial liability.
News And Analysis (1)
11 Major Filings
- Reply to Response re Motion to Dismiss Motion for Summary Judgment (Oct 16, 2024)
- PLAINTIFFS’ OPPOSITION TO DEFENDANTS’ MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT AND REPLY IN SUPPORT OF SUMMARY JUDGMENT (Sep 20, 2024)
- COMBINED MOTION TO DISMISS, CROSS-MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT, AND OPPOSITION TO PLAINTIFFS’ MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT (Aug 30, 2024)
- ORDER (Aug 23, 2024)
- ORDER (Jul 22, 2024)
- PLAINTIFFS’ MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT AND MEMORANDUM IN SUPPORT THEREOF (Jul 19, 2024)
- DEFENDANTS’ RESPONSE TO ORDER REGARDING POTENTIAL RECUSAL (Jul 9, 2024)
- STATEMENT REGARDING POSSIBLE RECUSAL (Jul 9, 2024)
- JOINT MOTION TO ENTER BRIEFING SCHEDULE (Jun 18, 2024)
- ORDER (Jun 6, 2024)
- COMPLAINT (May 21, 2024)