- Docket No.
- 1:23-cv-00077
- District Court
- North Carolina
Goal
- Declaration that North Carolina's restrictions on mifepristone are preempted by federal law
- Enjoin defendants from implementing the law
Issues
Case History
Litigation Content
Why this Matters:
The Plaintiff alleges that North Carolina’s legislation, which imposes several requirements to access and prescribe mifepristone, conflicts with the Food and Drug Administration’s (FDA’s) exclusive authority to impose restrictions on the prescribing, dispensing and administration of drugs. Ensuring that individuals have access to FDA-approved medication abortions enables patients to receive necessary reproductive health care.
Potential Impact:
Overriding the FDA’s expertise and preventing individuals from accessing effective medication for abortion services will jeopardize their health and safety.
39 Major Filings
- ORDER CONSOLIDATING THE CASES (Jul 9, 2024)
- DEFENDANT ATTORNEY GENERAL JOSHUA H. STEIN NOTICE OF CROSS-APPEAL (Jul 2, 2024)
- PLAINTIFF’S NOTICE OF CROSS-APPEAL (Jun 28, 2024)
- NOTICE OF APPEAL (Jun 20, 2024)
- JUDGMENT AND PERMANENT INJUNCTION (Jun 3, 2024)
- JOINT SUBMISSION REGARDING PROPOSED JUDGMENTS AND INJUNCTIONS (May 21, 2024)
- OPINION AND ORDER (Apr 30, 2024)
- DEFENDANT ATTORNEY GENERAL JOSHUA H. STEIN’S SUPPLEMENTAL MEMORANDUM OF LAW IN SUPPORT OF SUMMARY JUDGMENT (Feb 5, 2024)
- INTERVENOR-DEFENDANTS’ SUPPLEMENTAL BRIEF (Feb 5, 2024)
- SUPPLEMENTAL BRIEF IN SUPPORT OF PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT (Feb 5, 2024)
- MOTIONS HEARING (Jan 25, 2024)
- ANSWER OF DEFENDANT JEFF NIEMAN, IN HIS OFFICIAL CAPACITY AS DISTRICT ATTORNEY (Aug 21, 2023)
- ANSWER OF KODY H. KINSLEY, IN HIS OFFICIAL CAPACITY AS SECRETARY OF THE NORTH CAROLINA HHS (Aug 21, 2023)
- ANSWER TO FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT (Aug 21, 2023)
- DEFENDANT ATTORNEY GENERAL JOSHUA H. STEIN’S ANSWER TO FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT (Aug 21, 2023)
- REPLY IN SUPPORT OF MOTION TO DISMISS (Aug 21, 2023)
- DEFENDANT ATTORNEY GENERAL JOSHUA H. STEIN’S MEMORANDUM OF LAW IN OPPOSITION TO INTERVENOR-DEFENDANTS’ AMENDED MOTION TO DISMISS (Aug 16, 2023)
- PLAINTIFF’S MEMORANDUM OF LAW IN OPPOSITION TO INTERVENORS’ MOTION TO DISMISS AMENDED COMPLAINT (Aug 16, 2023)
- DEFENDANTS BERGER AND MOORE RULE 12(b)(6) MOTION TO DISMISS AMENDED COMPLAINT (Aug 14, 2023)
- MEMORANDUM IN SUPPORT OF DEFENDANTS BERGER AND MOORE FED. R. CIV. P. 12(b)(6) MOTION TO DISMISS AMENDED COMPLAINT (Aug 14, 2023)
- FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT (Aug 7, 2023)
- REPLY IN SUPPORT OF MOTION TO DISMISS (May 6, 2023)
- DEFENDANT ATTORNEY GENERAL JOSHUA H. STEIN’S MEMORANDUM OF LAW IN OPPOSITION TO INTERVENOR-DEFENDANTS’ MOTION TO DISMISS (Apr 28, 2023)
- MEMORANDUM OF LAW IN OPPOSITION TO INTERVENORS’ MOTION TO DISMISS (Apr 28, 2023)
- DEFENDANT MEDICAL BOARD’S STATEMENT IN RESPONSE TO DEFENDANT-INTERVENORS’ MOTION TO DISMISS (Apr 14, 2023)
- MEMORANDUM OF LAW IN OPPOSITION TO INTERVENORS’ MOTION TO DISMISS (Apr 8, 2023)
- ANSWER (Mar 24, 2023)
- ANSWER TO COMPLAINT ON BEHALF OF DEFENDANT JEFF NIEMAN (Mar 24, 2023)
- DEFENDANTS BERGER AND MOORE RULE 12(b)(6) MOTION TO DISMISS (Mar 24, 2023)
- MEMORANDUM IN SUPPORT OF DEFENDANTS BERGER AND MOORE MOTION TO DISMISS UNDER FED. R. CIV. P. 12(b)(6) (Mar 24, 2023)
- ORDER ON MOTION TO INTERVENE (Mar 10, 2023)
- RESPONSE OF DEFENDANT JEFF NIEMAN, IN HIS OFFICIAL CAPACITY AS DISTRICT ATTORNEY (Mar 8, 2023)
- DEFENDANT MEDICAL BOARD’S RESPONSE TO MOTION TO INTERVENE AS DEFENDANTS (Mar 7, 2023)
- RESPONSE OF KODY H. KINSLEY, IN HIS OFFICIAL CAPACITY AS SECRETARY OF THE NORTH CAROLINA HHS (Mar 1, 2023)
- ANSWER OF JOSHUA H. STEIN, IN HIS OFFICIAL CAPACITY AS ATTORNEY GENERAL (Feb 22, 2023)
- ANSWER OF KODY H. KINSLEY, IN HIS OFFICIAL CAPACITY AS SECRETARY OF THE NORTH CAROLINA HHS (Feb 22, 2023)
- MEMORANDUM IN SUPPORT OF MOTION TO INTERVENE AS DEFENDANTS (Feb 21, 2023)
- MOTION TO INTERVENE AS DEFENDANTS (Feb 21, 2023)
- COMPLAINT (Jan 23, 2023)