- Docket No.
- 25-2230
- Appellate Court
- First Circuit
Goal
- Block enforcement of an agency action
- Declaration that agency action is unlawful
Issues
Case History
Litigation Content
Potential Impact:
Why this Matters:
Plaintiffs argue that defendants’ freezing of federal grants and contracts to Harvard University based on vague notions of viewpoint discrimination violates the Administrative Procedure Act, violates the First Amendment, and exceeds executive authority. Harvard relies on federal funding to support medical, scientific, and technological research at its facilities. The defendants appeal a judgment vacating their freeze orders. This appeal addresses whether the district court erred in vacating all funding freezes and terminations of funding to Harvard University.
Potential Impact:
Loss of federal funding by higher education institutions compromises academic freedom and significantly reduces research operations, thus jeopardizing their ability to conduct critical research.
News And Analysis (1)
11 Major Filings
- SCHEDULING ORDER (Apr 30, 2026)
- DEFENDANTS' RESPONSE BRIEF (Apr 27, 2026)
- JOINT APPENDIX PART III (Apr 15, 2026)
- JOINT APPENDIX PART II (Apr 15, 2026)
- JOINT APPENDIX PART I (Apr 15, 2026)
- DEFENDANTS' OPENING BRIEF (Apr 15, 2026)
- ORDER (Mar 27, 2026)
- SCHEDULING ORDER (Feb 20, 2026)
- PLAINTIFF'S NOTICE (Feb 13, 2026)
- SCHEDULING ORDER (Jan 29, 2026)
- DEFENDANTS' NOTICE OF APPEAL (Dec 30, 2025)