Doe et al. v. Kupor

Docket No.
1:26-cv-02723
District Court
District of Columbia

Goal

  • Award damages
  • Block enforcement of an agency action
  • Certify class
  • Compel agency action
  • Declaration that agency action is unlawful

Litigation Content

Why This Matters:

Why This Matters

Federal employees who are transgender or gender non-conforming, or have a transgender dependent, challenge a new federal policy from the Office of Personnel Management that prohibits insurance coverage for gender-affirming care under the Federal Employee Health Benefits Program and the Postal Service Health Benefits Program. The plaintiffs argue that the new policy discriminates against federal employees on the basis of sex in violation of Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964.

Potential Impact:

Potential Impact

Gender-based restrictions on health care coverage for gender-affirming care inhibit access to medically necessary care, create financial hardship, and exacerbate disparities in health and socioeconomic status.

2 Major Filings

Litigation Information

Current Status

Briefing is ongoing