- Docket No.
- 21-1731
- Appellate Court
- Eighth Circuit
Goal
- Block enforcement of a law
- Declaration that a law is unlawful
Issues
Case History
Litigation Content
Why this Matters:
The plaintiffs argue that a Minnesota law that requires manufacturers to provide certain drugs to qualifying low-income Minnesotans free of cost violates the Takings Clause of the Fifth Amendment. On appeal, the plaintiffs argue that the district court erred in finding that the plaintiffs lacked standing to seek relief.
Potential Impact:
The inability for state policymakers to address prescription drug affordability could negate savings for patients, and more broadly restrict state regulatory authority in the health care arena.
11 Major Filings
- ORDER ON PETITION FOR REHEARING EN BANC (May 9, 2023)
- DEFENDANTS' PETITION FOR REHEARING EN BANC (Apr 17, 2023)
- OPINION (Apr 3, 2023)
- PLAINTIFF'S NOTICE (Dec 20, 2021)
- NOTICE OF ORAL ARGUMENTS (Jul 22, 2021)
- PLAINTIFF'S REPLY BRIEF (Jul 15, 2021)
- AMICUS BRIEF [T1INTERNATIONAL ET AL.] (Jun 29, 2021)
- DEFENDANTS' RESPONSE BREIF (Jun 23, 2021)
- AMICUS BRIEF [NATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF MANUFACTURERS ET AL.] (Jun 1, 2021)
- AMICUS BRIEF [PACIFIC LEGAL FOUNDATION ET AL.] (Jun 1, 2021)
- PLAINTIFF'S OPENING BRIEF (May 25, 2021)