Healthcare Distribution Alliance v. Boughton et al.

Docket No.
25-3216
Appellate Court
Second Circuit

Goal

  • Block enforcement of a law
  • Declaration that a law is unlawful

Litigation Content

Why this Matters:

The plaintiff argues that a Connecticut law prohibiting generic drug manufacturers from excessively increasing prices violates the Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment, the Dormant Commerce Clause, and the Contracts Clause. Price gouging laws are one approach states are currently pursuing to lower prescription drug costs for their residents. The plaintiff appeals a district court decision denying their motion for a preliminary injunction.

Potential Impact:

The inability for state policymakers to address prescription drug affordability could negate savings for patients, and more broadly restrict state regulatory authority in the health care arena.

Litigation Information

Current Status

Briefing is ongoing

Important Date

Defendants' Reply Brief Due