- Docket No.
- 3:25-cv-00498
- District Court
- Connecticut
Goal
- Award damages
- Compel defendant action
Issues
Case History
Litigation Content
Why This Matters:
Why This Matters:
The plaintiff, a New York-based medical provider, sued a health insurer following the resolution of the No Surprises Act’s arbitration process—a process used to resolve payment disputes for surprise out-of-network bills between payers and out-of-network health care providers. The plaintiff alleges that the insurer failed to make the arbitration payments and asks the court to confirm the arbitration awards. The No Surprises Act provides for strict limitations on the judicial review of arbitration awards to facilitate a swift and cost-efficient resolution of disputes between payers and providers.
Potential Impact:
Potential Impact:
Actions that flout the intent of the No Surprises Act arbitration process could lead to higher costs and lower-quality care for patients.
News And Analysis (2)
15 Major Filings
- ORDER ON MOTION TO STAY JUDGMENT (May 19, 2026)
- DEFENDANT'S MOTION TO STAY JUDGMENT (May 15, 2026)
- DEFENDANT'S NOTICE OF APPEAL (May 1, 2026)
- JUDGMENT (Apr 16, 2026)
- SCHEDULING ORDER (Apr 15, 2026)
- ORDER ON CROSS-MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT (Apr 15, 2026)
- ORDER ON MOTION TO DISMISS AND CROSS-MOTION TO CONFIRM (Apr 15, 2026)
- PLAINTIFF'S NOTICE OF SUPPLEMENTAL AUTHORITY (Apr 15, 2026)
- DEFENDANT'S NOTICE OF SUPPLEMENTAL AUTHORITY (Apr 3, 2026)
- SCHEDULING ORDER (Mar 31, 2026)
- PLAINTIFF'S REPLY RE: CROSS-MOTIONS TO CONFIRM AND FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT (Feb 16, 2026)
- DEFENDANT'S REPLY RE: MOTION TO DISMISS AND RESPONSE TO CROSS-MOTIONS TO CONFIRM AND FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT (Jan 12, 2026)
- PLAINTIFF'S RESPONSE TO MOTION TO DISMISS AND CROSS-MOTIONS TO CONFIRM AND FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT (Nov 21, 2025)
- DEFENDANT'S MOTION TO DISMISS (Sep 26, 2025)
- COMPLAINT (Mar 27, 2025)