Highmark Inc. v. Remote Neuromonitoring Physicians PC et al.

Docket No.
2:26-cv-01214
District Court
Pennsylvania Western

Goal

  • Award damages
  • Award restitution
  • Block defendant action
  • Vacate arbitration awards

Litigation Content

Why This Matters:

Why This Matters:

A private health insurer alleges that a health care provider that offers neuromonitoring services and a third-party biller are abusing the No Surprises Act Independent Dispute Resolution (IDR) process. The insurer claims that these entities repeatedly submitted ineligible disputes and made other misrepresentations to IDR entities to secure inflated payments. The higher than expected volume of arbitration cases (including the prevalence of ineligible cases) to date and high provider win rate could raise health costs and plan premiums.

Potential Impact:

Potential Impact:

Actions that flout the intent of the No Surprises Act arbitration process through the submission of ineligible disputes could lead to higher costs and lower-quality care for patients.

2 Major Filings

Litigation Information

Current Status

Briefing is ongoing

Important Date

Defendant's Response to Complaint Due