United States ex rel. Zafirov v. Florida Medical Associates LLC et al.

Docket No.
24-13581
Appellate Court
Eleventh Circuit

Goal

  • Award damages

Litigation Content

Why This Matters:

Why This Matters

A physician filed a whistleblower lawsuit against her former employer and other provider organizations, alleging that the defendants violated the False Claims Act by submitting inaccurate, incomplete, unsupported, or otherwise false diagnosis codes for Medicare Advantage enrollees. The physician alleges that the defendants submitted this false information – otherwise known as upcoding – to improperly obtain millions of dollars in overpayments from the Medicare program. The Department of Justice intervened to defend the constitutionality of whistleblower lawsuits under the False Claims Act. The physician and the Department of Justice appealed a district court order dismissing the case after finding the whistleblower statute to be unconstitutional.

Potential Impact:

Potential Impact

Ensuring accurate claims for Medicare Advantage enrollees prevents fraud, protects taxpayer dollars, and keeps health care costs low for patients. The False Claims Act is the government’s primary tool to combat health care fraud, and whistleblower lawsuits play an especially important role in protecting patients and consumers by curbing unnecessary and harmful medical treatments, reducing wasteful spending, and deterring fraud to the tune of nearly 10 times the amount that is recovered.

Litigation Information

Current Status

Briefing is ongoing