- Docket No.
- 25-3216
- Appellate Court
- Second Circuit
Goal
- Block enforcement of a law
- Declaration that a law is unlawful
Issues
Case History
Litigation Content
Why this Matters:
The plaintiff argues that a Connecticut law prohibiting generic drug manufacturers from excessively increasing prices violates the Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment, the Dormant Commerce Clause, and the Contracts Clause. Price gouging laws are one approach states are currently pursuing to lower prescription drug costs for their residents. The plaintiff appeals a district court decision denying their motion for a preliminary injunction.
Potential Impact:
The inability for state policymakers to address prescription drug affordability could negate savings for patients, and more broadly restrict state regulatory authority in the health care arena.
6 Major Filings
- ORDER DENYING INJUNCTION PENDING APPEAL (Jan 28, 2026)
- PLAINTIFF'S OPENING BRIEF (Jan 14, 2026)
- ORDER (Dec 31, 2025)
- DEFENDANTS' RESPONSE RE: EMERGENCY MOTION FOR INJUNCTION (Dec 31, 2025)
- PLAINTIFF'S EMERGENCY MOTION FOR INJUNCTION AND FOR EXPEDITED APPEAL (Dec 29, 2025)
- PLAINTIFF'S NOTICE OF APPEAL (Dec 26, 2025)